[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS vs BDB

From: David Weintraub <qazwart_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:14:34 -0500

I've always used FSFS. Mainly because it is easier to maintain and has
fewer headaches. No wedging issues, etc.

However, FSFS can be slower in certain circumstances. Plus, FSFS makes
Subversion's data structure harder to modify. (This really doesn't
affect the users, but the developers. I bet the developers would
rather everyone use DBD, so they can simplify the structure).

Originally, Subversion only used DBD. FSFS was added in Subversion 1.2
and made the default in Subversion 1.3.

This page should explain everything:
<http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs>.

--
David Weintraub
qazwart_at_gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:38 AM,  <sandeep.saxena_at_rbs.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any thoughts on which format (FSFS or BDB) is recommended for big projects.
> From what I read on Internet Reviews, FSFS is always recommended.
>
> Regards,
> Sandeep.
>
> ***********************************************************************************
> The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB.
> Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority
>
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the
> addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other
> than the addressee, please return the message to the sender
> by replying to it and then delete the message from your
> computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The
> Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for
> changes made to this message after it was sent.
>
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the
> transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to
> ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this
> message and any attachments will not adversely affect its
> systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The
> Royal Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry
> out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.
> Visit our websites at:
> www.rbs.com
> www.rbs.com/gbm
> www.rbsgc.com
> ***********************************************************************************
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-11-12 21:14:55 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.