On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:40 AM, <Paul_Koning_at_dell.com> wrote:
> *>*I just don't like any of the current protocols:
> >
> >http --> too slow
> >https --> even more slow, difficult to setup
> >svn --> insecure, featureless, dull
>
>
>
> Dull? What does that mean? It works great and fast. And its security is
> fine for many cases, though certainly not for public servers.
>
>
> >svn+ssh --> pain in the ***, doesn't play well with TortoiseSVN.
>
>
>
> That's not true, it works fine. Take a look at Pageant (part of PuTTY) or
> an equivalent SSH key agent.
>
I say it is dull because it is featureless. I have to edit a text file to
add uers, that's pretty dull and featureless to me. Sure, it's fast, that's
why I like it. But being fast doesn't make it the greatest thing ever to me.
And svn+ssh works fine for *you*. For me, I've had endless issues out of the
authentication dialog in TortoiseSVN (It not showing up, etc).
Received on 2008-10-16 20:12:40 CEST