[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

non-recursive-add isn't that useful? why is there no ".svn" folder in there? why can't I add more files?

From: Geoffrey Plitt <geoff_at_gweb.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:50:04 -0700

when i do "svn add -N" on a folder, i expected it to make a ".svn" folder
underneath, and then any files under there would have a "?" status.

instead, the folder is added, but there is NO WAY to add the files
underneath, becase it's not a working copy. so what's the point of this
mode?

-g

-- 
https://twitter.com/GeoffreyPlitt

Received on 2008-10-16 03:50:34 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Robert Dailey: "User management"
Previous message: Jeremy Kitchen: "Re: commit problem with 1.4.2 (r22196)"
Next in thread: David Weintraub: "Re: non-recursive-add isn't that useful? why is there no ".svn" folder in there? why can't I add more files?"
Reply: David Weintraub: "Re: non-recursive-add isn't that useful? why is there no ".svn" folder in there? why can't I add more files?"
Maybe reply: David Weintraub: "Re: non-recursive-add isn't that useful? why is there no ".svn" folder in there? why can't I add more files?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.