Please be sure to Reply To All.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 16:11, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday_at_crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> Quoting Andy Levy <andy.levy_at_gmail.com>:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 16:03, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday_at_crashcourse.ca>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ok, let's try this again. what is the reason for the occasional small
>>> gap
>>> in the revision numbers of a repo when i run "svn log"? i'm sure i'll
>>> regret asking this, but i poked around and i can't imagine why some
>>> revision
>>> numbers just don't exist in the full log. thanks.
>>
>> Are you running it for the repository root, or a subdirectory?
>
> never mind ... i was running "svn log" against the trunk without realizing
> that there was a branch that contained those "missing" revision numbers. my
> bad. so, just to be pedantic here, every single integer should represent a
> revision of *some* kind, right? there's no reason for a revision number to
> be missing in action, correct? thanks
No, there should never be a "missing" revision number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-22 01:28:38 CEST