Re: AW: Why does reply not reply to the list?

Felix Gilcher wrote:

BTW: IMO Robert Graf-Waczenski misunderstood:

>> Since this thread apparently is a poll now, i'll add my vote here:

I intended no poll about reply-to munging.

Read again: My +1 was regarding "Anyone in favor of "The Principle of
Least Pretension"?", not reply-to munging.

>I doubt this will be decided by poll,

Ack.

> please let the thread finally die. It's annoying that this topic
> needs to be discussed every time someone new asks - it only adds
> noise for no benefit. Quietly pointing to the FAQ entry should be
> sufficient, no discussion required.

The FAQ is not infallible. It must be allowed to point out other
opinions, and that both cited articles don't use correct arguments.

> Why can't we just all go live with it and let the mailing list admin(s) decide.

JFTR: I didn't ask the list admin for anything.

>If it were a poll:
>
>-1 - keep it as it is.

if you consider it annoying, why do you participate?

Oliver

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-08 17:24:13 CEST