Re: Why does reply not reply to the list?

Oliver Betz wrote:
> Quinn Taylor wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I also agree completely with your very detailed remarks.
>
> Reply-To munging is not generally wrong, and especially for this list,
> I'm sure that "munging" would be better because now many valuable
> replies are lost for the community simply because people don't
> remember that they have to add the list address to the recipient list
> (I usually forgot it). And in _this_ list, there is little risk of
> sending annoying personal replies accidentally to the list.
>
> BTW: My solution is to use gmane to read tis list.
>
> Oliver
>

Since this thread apparently is a poll now, i'll add my vote here:

+1 in favor of Reply-To munging

Robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-08-08 15:26:12 CEST