Emre Uslu wrote:
> These users put and modify documents in a folder under branches and when
> documents are ready for review they put it to another folder under tags.
> If the reviewer thinks that document is not appropriate, they should
> continue working on the folder under branches. But some users are
> modifying the documents under tags folder by mistake. That's why I want
> to permit modifying the files under the tags folder.
>
> EMRE USLU
You probably don't want to hear that, but this workflow is wrong... You
"tag" something when it's done and you want to keep it, i.e. AFTER the
review.
The way you're doing it, you have many documents under "tags" that did
not pass the review - this can also be confusing for other people who
just want to access the documents... Do you delete the documents when
they are rejected? And then what happens to the "next version" if the
user is not allowed to modify the previous document under "tags"? Is
every version saved under a new name?! That's not really how a version
control system is used...
Suggestion: Users work on documents under "branches" and ask for a
review when they think it's appropriate.
The reviewer can review documents and also make changes or remarks if
he/she wants to do that.
When the review passed ok, the reviewer copies the document to the tags
folder (by using svn copy, so it keeps its history from the branch...).
This means: All "work" happens in a branch. When the work is done, you
create a tag.
Regards,
Holger
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
Received on 2008-04-09 17:38:44 CEST