Re: The reversal: SVN to CVS

Paul Koning wrote:
>
> Basically CVS is long-obsolete junk. It never was a source control
> system; it's really only a versioned-file system, with each file
> managed separately. The appearance that changes to several files are
> somehow related is just a fiction created by the CVS UI.

Applying tags based on your working copy versions actually does a pretty
good job of handling that "somehow related" concept, but directory
operations and renames are painful compared to svn.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell_at_gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org