Re: Update the working copy - again...
From: computergenius <computergenius_at_hotcosta.com>
Date: 2007-12-13 00:32:33 CET
>> I was being told to update the working copy. I had assumed that it
>The name "working copy" comes from the fact that it is a *copy* of
Yes, but having the same name for two different things can lead to
>> The answer in my case was, on the development, coding, machine, to
>You don't need to make a backup of the file. You can just "svn
IF (!sure) THEN backup
>Great. I do want to recommend again, though, that you spend some time
I have been through it, and will return to it.
> These are basic questions about how
The problem was understanding the terminology - and if you can't grasp that,
But now that I understand it, I will get back into it. Like most
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Update-the-working-copy---again...-tp14277792p14306492.html Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Dec 13 00:32:56 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.