RE: Communication of CHANGES

"Bicking, David (HHoldings, IT)" <David.Bicking@thehartford.com> wrote on
11/28/2007 10:19:39 AM:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Thomas [mailto:thomasgd@omc.bt.co.uk]
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:35:05 -0500, "Mark Phippard"
> > <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >This did not perform well enough for TortoiseSVN (or
> > Subclipse) so we
> > >both have our own caches.
> >
> > It strikes me that if two different clients have their own
> > custom cache, then that alone is a good argument to supply a
> > similar caching mechanism in the API so that all clients can
> > share the same cache.
>
> Um... I SECOND that assertion.

And I THIRD that assertion.

But others have already been very vocal about what they perceive as a
potential for user confusion, if implemented.

Kevin R.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 28 17:40:59 2007