> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Thomas [mailto:thomasgd@omc.bt.co.uk]
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 09:35:05 -0500, "Mark Phippard"
> <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >This did not perform well enough for TortoiseSVN (or
> Subclipse) so we
> >both have our own caches.
>
> It strikes me that if two different clients have their own
> custom cache, then that alone is a good argument to supply a
> similar caching mechanism in the API so that all clients can
> share the same cache.
Um... I SECOND that assertion.
>
> Greg
> --
*************************************************************************
This communication, including attachments, is
for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
destroy all copies.
*************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 28 17:20:09 2007