On 9/26/07, Matthew Hannigan <mlh@zip.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:39:37PM +1000, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > On 9/26/07, Matjaz <mc1607slo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/26/07, Dmitri Colebatch <dim@colebatch.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I must be missing something. In CVS I can do a "cvs -q up -n" which
> > > > will tell me what CVS would do it I did an update. Subversion doesn't
> > > > seem to have this feature. Can someone tell me if this is something
> > > > I've missed?
> > >
> > > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.forcvs.status-vs-update.html
> >
> > Bugger... whilst I knew that it had to be something I'd missed, I wish
> > I hadn't been quite so stupid about it.... thanks for the reference.
>
> Don't be hard on yourself. I think something like svn status --dryrun
> would be an eminently intuitive command, and I've never used CVS
I think you mean svn up --dryrun. There's no need for a "dry run" of
svn st because it doesn't make any changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 26 14:17:02 2007