[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: update without updating?

From: Matthew Hannigan <mlh_at_zip.com.au>
Date: 2007-09-26 12:29:57 CEST

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 05:39:37PM +1000, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Matjaz <mc1607slo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/26/07, Dmitri Colebatch <dim@colebatch.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I must be missing something. In CVS I can do a "cvs -q up -n" which
> > > will tell me what CVS would do it I did an update. Subversion doesn't
> > > seem to have this feature. Can someone tell me if this is something
> > > I've missed?
> >
> > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.forcvs.status-vs-update.html
> Bugger... whilst I knew that it had to be something I'd missed, I wish
> I hadn't been quite so stupid about it.... thanks for the reference.

Don't be hard on yourself. I think something like svn status --dryrun
would be an eminently intuitive command, and I've never used CVS

> For those interested, my problem was that I was still in cvs mindset
> and using update to determine the status. "svn st -u" does exactly
> what I want.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 26 12:51:41 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.