[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Forcing commit of unmodified file

From: Arnauld Van Muysewinkel <arnauldvm_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-06-13 16:37:23 CEST

2007/6/13, Andy Levy <andy.levy@gmail.com>:
> On 6/13/07, Arnauld Van Muysewinkel <arnauldvm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2007/6/13, Andreas Mahel <andreas.mahel@gmx.net>:
> > > Arnauld Van Muysewinkel wrote:


> > On another hand, I still don't understand why SVN is preventing this...
> Because there's really no good reason for incrementing the global
> revision number if nothing changed?

Well, there are times where one wants to differentiate two revision
number, even though the content has not changed.

And also because there are times where one wants to commit to have the
occasion to add a new revision comment.

I wouldn't expect svn to do that always though, only when the user
explicitly requires it by adding a flag, like it's possible to do in
[ From time to time I'm surprised to see that SVN is sometimes less
efficient than CVS in some specific occasions. (I've other concerns,
but they'll better fit in another post) ].

Arnauld Van Muysewinkel
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 13 16:40:01 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.