Re: newbie question
From: Talden <talden_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-05-08 13:23:47 CEST
If the two apps have different development cycles then I'd opt for an
You do an internal vendor drop of the current code into each app. If
This lack of dependency allows you to beta release internal branches
Done early and packaged up tidily you'll have little overhead and no
-- Talden On 5/7/07, Paul <paul@domains.textdriven.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a simple newbie question: > > From what I have read and what I have always used is this repo structure: > > root > |-----trunk > |-----branches > |--------* > |-----tags > |--------* > > In one application I am working on I need to 'folk' it and maintain two > apps that are 95% the same. Any major features will be shared/merged > between them. > > What is the *correct* way to handle this? Should I just branch and > delete the trunk? Like this: > > root > |-----branches > |--------app1 > |--------app2 > |--------* > |-----tags > |--------* > > or: > > root > |-----trunks > |--------app1 > |--------app2 > |-----branches > |--------* > |-----tags > |--------* > > I don't want to create separate repos for them if I don't have to. > > What is the correct and easiest way of dealing with this? > > Many thanks, > > Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue May 8 13:24:04 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.