[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Regarding Subversion on NFS with Berkeley DB repository

From: Russ <rsivak_at_istandfor.com>
Date: 2007-05-04 17:01:33 CEST

From what I remember from percups discussions on the list - BDB is good, but only if you are an expert at working with BDB. if you are new to BDB, you should be using fsfs.

Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Blumel <jb-lists@medikin.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 10:47:28
To:Subversion List <users@subversion.tigris.org>
Subject: Re: Regarding Subversion on NFS with Berkeley DB repository

Larry Martell wrote:
> On 5/4/07, John Blumel <jb-lists@medikin.com> wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
>> > You should always use FSFS.
>> Well, I'm new to Subversion, so I'll ask, why?
> Please do not email me directly. Always post to the list.
> If you're new to subversion then you should do some basic research on
> your own. Google is your friend. I'll get you started:
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs

Well, sorry about emailing you directly; I intended to post to the list,
but I'm still working on my coffee. Thanks for reposting to the list.

And, actually (since there seem to be pros and cons to both FSF and
BDB), I was sort of interested in finding out if this ["You should
always use FSFS."] is generally becoming a consensus opinion or if many
intend to have BDB pried from their cold, dead fingers.

John Blumel

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 4 17:02:39 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.