[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Regarding Subversion on NFS with Berkeley DB repository

From: John Blumel <jb-lists_at_medikin.com>
Date: 2007-05-04 16:47:28 CEST

Larry Martell wrote:
> On 5/4/07, John Blumel <jb-lists@medikin.com> wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
>>
>> > You should always use FSFS.
>>
>> Well, I'm new to Subversion, so I'll ask, why?
>
> Please do not email me directly. Always post to the list.
>
> If you're new to subversion then you should do some basic research on
> your own. Google is your friend. I'll get you started:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/fsfs

Well, sorry about emailing you directly; I intended to post to the list,
but I'm still working on my coffee. Thanks for reposting to the list.

And, actually (since there seem to be pros and cons to both FSF and
BDB), I was sort of interested in finding out if this ["You should
always use FSFS."] is generally becoming a consensus opinion or if many
intend to have BDB pried from their cold, dead fingers.

John Blumel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 4 16:50:28 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.