Re: svn-book inconsistency?

On Mar 25, 2007, at 09:06, I Am wrote:

> It seems that the svn-book.html (for 1.2) is inconsistent with
> regard to its use
> (or not) of "trunk" in the examples. I've tried to use the book as a
> project-side companion as I created my first project using SVN.
> I'm a past CVS
> user. I've found myself making mistakes several times now with
> regard to the
> use of "trunk".
>
> I think what is happening is that some parts of book explicitly use
> "myproject/trunk" (or the equivalent) in an example, and some parts
> don't. For
> example, the "snv checkout" synopsis does NOT mention trunk.
>
> I'm beginning to realize that the use of "trunk" is just a
> convention so the
> documentation isn't wrong. But it would help eliminate confusion
> if it always
> used "trunk" in all examples with possibly a note saying that the
> use of trunk
> isn't strictly necessary.

Welcome to Subversion!

Feedback on the book is best provided on the book's mailing list:

http://www.red-bean.com/mailman/listinfo/svnbook-dev

-- 
To reply to the mailing list, please use your mailer's Reply To All  
function
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org