[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Do working copies "cache" information?

From: Neil Obremski <weenie_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-03-15 14:04:34 CET

Have you disabled the "NTFS Last Accessed Update"? I've always found this
to help considerably on machines where folders can have tens of thousands of
files.

Disable by going to the registry key "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\ System\
CurrentControlSet\ Control\ FileSystem" and setting a new DWORD called
'NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate' to '1'. I believe you'll have to reboot
afterwards.

On 3/14/07, Jeff Barrett <jbarrett@finaplex.com> wrote:
>
> If I have a good sized working copy (11k files, 200mb) checked out on
> windows that has not had any svn operations performed on it for a while,
> it will take 5+ minutes to perform an "svn status" or "svnversion"
> However, once that 5+ minute invocation of "svn status" has completed,
> if I run it again it takes < 5 seconds.
>
> I'm assuming there is local caching on disk, am I right? How does it
> work? Are there things I can do to make it faster for SVN to
> create/update that cache? We've already done things like disabled
> Windows file-system indexing and turned off virus checkers.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 15 14:05:19 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.