Re: FSFS performance on NAS/NFS

Justin Johnson wrote:
> CollabNet said there wouldn't be any data integrity issues with
> NAS/NFS and FSFS as long as only one server was accessing the
> repository and the version of NFS supported locking. Mounting on
> multiple servers concurrently and load balancing would require a
> clustered file system.
>
> My question was specifically related to performance though. Is there
> anyone out there using FSFS repositories on NAS/NFS? Does the
> performance "really really really suck?" Should I go with Berkeley
> instead?

That's going to be up to the NAS and your client NFS implementation -
and maybe the amount of RAM on each. NetApp filers have always been
very usable with NFS for maildir mailboxes which do a lot of small file
access - but that's on the expensive side.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@gmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org