Thomas Despoix wrote:
> Thanks for your information. Yet, even if I'm not fully familiar with
> installing packages and dependency rules, I'm probably missing something
> but when i do something like :
>
> > rpm -ivh subversion-tools-1.3.2-1.rh7x.i386.rpm
>
> Here is rpm's answer :
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> apache-libapr >= 2.0.48-0.1 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> neon >= 0.24.7 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> python2 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> libapr-0.so.0 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> libaprutil-0.so.0 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> libcrypto.so.2 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> libneon.so.24 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
> libssl.so.2 is needed by subversion-1.3.2-1
... and likely a longer and longer list as you clear up each of those.
RH7.2 hasn't been supported by anyone I know of for several years now,
and the Fedora Legacy project "recently" (~3 months ago now) dropped
support for RH7.3. I would seriously look into replacing this machine
if at all possible.
Other than that, you're probably better off trying to build from source
than chasing an ever-growing chain of dependencies (which will likely
end up replacing half the system). Even then, however, you may need
newer versions of some libraries.
If you're *really* lucky, you *may* be able to take someone's Subversion
packages, and rebuild the .src.rpm under RH7.2. You *may* also be able
to install packages built for RH7.3; I don't recall enough detail about
what changed between those two versions.
-kgd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 7 23:58:00 2007