Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

Concerning Re: Poor performance in windows. Sw
Dave Grundgeiger wrote on 14 Feb 2007, 12:49, at least in part:

> Jeff Smith wrote:
> > Makes sense to me that we need the "--force" option or whatever,
> > because flaws already exist where in some cases the timestamp is
> > known to be unreliable.
>
> I don't have an opinion about whether the feature should be created,
> but if it does make its way in, I'd like to vote for a switch name
> that's more revealing as to what it's actually doing. Something along
> the lines of "--ignore-timestamp" perhaps.

Good idea! Here's another one: --check-hash. Or: --compare-
checksum ... --check-md5 ... or even just --checksum/hash/md5.

JH
---------------------------------------
Freedom quote:

     Democracy means that if the doorbell rings in the early hours,
     it is likely to be the milkman.
               -- Sir Winston Churchill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 15 12:39:59 2007