Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

For the developers, ensure that their virus scanner doesn't
excessively scan the working copy (at the least ignoring .svn content,
at best ignore the whole working copy) and as already noted don't
allow windows to index these files.

For CVS and Subversion I'd expect both of these changes to pay
dividends in Windows file-system performance (well as much as the
windows file-system has to offer anyway).

--
Talden
On 2/8/07, Joaquim Oliveira <joaquim.oliveira@atlantico.com.br> wrote:
> Dmitri Colebatch escreveu:
> > Do you guys tag at all?  We've recently migrated a 16000 odd file
> > repository and have certainly found that some operations are slower,
> > but the tagging speed of svn compared to cvs is something that would
> > definately stop me from switching back (o:
> >
> Hi Dmitri,
>
> We do tag. But I'm the CM guy who tags and there are 30 developers who
> commit/update more often than I tag. Unfortunately, their priority is
> higher than mine. :-(
>
> All, thanks for the quick answers. Just to clarify: our svn server is a
> linux box (Ubuntu 6.10, up-to-date, ext3 filesystem). Our developers
> aren't going to develop using linux because of lack of experience in
> this environment.
>
> --
>
>
>     Joaquim Oliveira, MSc
>
>
>       Analista de Sistemas
>
>
>
> Fone: +55 (85) 3216.7971
> Fax: +55 (85) 3216.7864
> Skype: joaquim.oliveira
>
>
>         ISO 9001 : 2000 - CMMI3
>
>
>
>
>         www.atlantico.com.br <http://www.atlantico.com.br>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org