Re: Poor performance in windows. Switching back to CVS

At 09:57 AM 2/7/2007, B. Smith-Mannschott wrote:

<BSM>>>>>Not fast. But, fast enough for my purposes. I certainly
wouldn't want to go back to CVS. Not only is rename nice, but the
efficient handling of binary files allows us to use SVN in situations
where we wouldn't have bothered to consider CVS.<<<<<

Also, if there are truly that many thousands and thousands of files,
I would think the atomic commit would be worth any conceivable level
of aggravation caused by lack of speed. I certainly wouldn't want to
go back to CVS on that basis alone.

Question... commits are atomic, are "updates" also atomic?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 7 17:14:12 2007