Felix Gilcher wrote:
> just to put one thing straight: I'm not the one who brought up the idea of "labels as revision alias". I'm not opposed per se, but I don't think I need it (and haven't seen a usecase for it so far). I'm just throwing in problems I see with the suggestions made.
>
My reason for wanting it. There have been times when I have needed to
remove something from the repo (sensitive info or on rare occasions
major accidents that increase the repo size more than I like). This
shifts revision numbers. This really messes things up when I sometimes
need to record the revisions numbers I merged some changes from in the
commit log. There are times when you only need parts of a branch
merged. If I could use a label name instead of a revision number it
would move to the new revision number automatically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 29 20:36:40 2006