[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Tim Hill <drtimhill_at_comcast.net>
Date: 2006-11-15 18:57:49 CET

Well, maybe point him to any number of web discussions about how VSS
regularly loses *everything* that it has stored. Does he want minor
workflow issues around rev numbers, or total data loss?

VSS is not an industrial-strength product. Subversion is. Period.
And, yes, I've used both extensively.


On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Eric wrote:

> The one person who is most adamantly opposed to SVN and is so
> adamantly pushing VSS is a partner in the business and so there is
> no one above him who can do any of that.
> He is a "my way or the highway" type whose mind typically cannot be
> changed.
Received on Wed Nov 15 18:58:53 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.