[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006d_at_ryandesign.com>
Date: 2006-11-15 03:30:30 CET

On Nov 14, 2006, at 15:35, Les Mikesell wrote:

>> You don't need remote access to run svn info. If you don't even have
>> local svn access to a working copy, then I guess you're out of luck,
>> unless you had the foresight to use svn:keywords in the file.
>
> Well, that's the point. svn:keywords might work in the unlikely
> event that this is a plain text document and someone thought to
> add them. [snip]

svn:keywords can work in binary documents too (e.g. Word documents or
what have you). Just be sure to use the fixed-width keyword syntax:

http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2005-07/0819.shtml

However, keywords wouldn't work in compressed documents, like
OpenOffice.org documents. :-/

If you don't want keywords appearing in your files, perhaps because
it looks ugly, then that's your decision, but that decision applies
just as much to text files as it does to binary files.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 15 03:31:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.