[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion vs CVS for document files

From: Tim Hill <drtimhill_at_comcast.net>
Date: 2006-11-14 22:33:59 CET

I guess it would help to understand the workflow better. You
mentioned talking over the phone and people who the document but do
not have access to svn or the repository. What is the intended usage
here? There is probably some form of tagging that will give you what
you want.

--Tim

On Nov 14, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 15:29 -0500, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>
>>> How do you describe this document, say over the phone? I've got
>>> Revision: 528, someone else got 595, neither of us currently have
>>> access to the log file. Are they the same document or not?
>>
>> How did you determine that you've got rev 595? You looked in the
>> wrong
>> place in svn info. You don't need the log for that.
>
> That's what svn update told me when I got it. What's the right place
> to look for the right info, and how would you describe it so everyone
> is sure if they have the same thing when no one involved has svn
> access at the time? Unlike source code, documents tend to have their
> own lives outside of the repository. What's the shortest way to
> describe the last change if you don't copy it to a tag?
>
> --
> Les Mikesell
> lesmikesell@gmail.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 14 22:35:24 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.