Re: question about subversion

Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>> This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>> information
>> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.
>
> If so, why did you send it to a public mailing list? Also, one-sided
> agreements DON'T get protected by law: you can't impose an agreement
> without agreement from the other side...
>
I don't like these either, but according to my reading of
http://subversion.tigris.org/mailing-list-guidelines.html , there's no
official (or implied) rule against posting from accounts that append
this kind of crud. Perhaps something should be added there one way or
the other, to prevent this off-topic discussion in the future?

I can't say I know what the solution to the problem of stupid
robo-disclaimers is, but I'm pretty sure that when its found, it won't
involve harassing the victims. I can certainly understand your desire to
vent about it though.

-- 
T.E.D.   Work     -  mailto:dennison@ssd.fsi.com
         Home     -  mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison)
         Homepage -  http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org