[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: performance CVS Vs SVN

From: Dmitri Colebatch <dim_at_colebatch.com>
Date: 2006-10-29 02:21:23 CEST

We're about to change from CVS to SVN and one of the major factors in the
time taken to lay a tag. We have a large CVS repository with several years
worth of archives. Tagging takes minutes as opposed to seconds for SVN.

cheers
dim

On 10/29/06, Kevin Greiner <greinerk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/27/06, surendra M <surendrahere@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Having an idea of migrating my repository from PVCS to CVS or SVN
> > I did an evalution.
> > I could see some mail posts discussing the performnace of CVS Vs SVN.
> > But they were carried out on old version of CVS and SVN.
> >
>
>
> When my company recently switched to version control software, CVS was a
> complete non-starter due to lack of rename support and non-atomic committs.
> It doesn't matter how much faster CVS is, if it doesn't do what you need.
>
Received on Sun Oct 29 02:22:04 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.