[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: performance CVS Vs SVN

From: Kevin Greiner <greinerk_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-10-28 16:06:05 CEST

On 10/27/06, surendra M <surendrahere@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having an idea of migrating my repository from PVCS to CVS or SVN
> I did an evalution.
> I could see some mail posts discussing the performnace of CVS Vs SVN.
> But they were carried out on old version of CVS and SVN.

When my company recently switched to version control software, CVS was a
complete non-starter due to lack of rename support and non-atomic committs.
It doesn't matter how much faster CVS is, if it doesn't do what you need.
Received on Sat Oct 28 16:06:58 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.