AW: Keeping a hot/live FSFS repo for failover
From: Volker Hage <sanam_dry_chili_at_yahoo.de>
Date: 2006-10-17 18:56:36 CEST
Dear all,
is it possible to build an active/active (or in other words: dual-master) Repository on two locations with DRBD yet ? Has someone experiences ?
----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----
Von: Thomas Harold <tgh_at_tgharold.com>
An: Kyle Kline <kyle.kline_at_gmail.com>
CC: users_at_subversion.tigris.org
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 17. Oktober 2006, 13:54:47 Uhr
Betreff: Re: Keeping a hot/live FSFS repo for failover
Kyle Kline wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm implementing an SVN repository with a failover on a sibling server
> (100mbs LAN), built to do failover very very quickly (two identically
> configured SVN services, with load balancer directing traffic at the
> primary.)
Wouldn't DRBD or other high-availability software be a better fit?
AFAIK, DBRD works at the block level, automatically transmitting
disk-level updates from one server to the other.
(DRBD is still on my to-do list for this month or next. We're running
our SVN server inside a Xen guest and I need to get things setup so that
I can move it between a pair of Xen servers.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_subversion.tigris.org
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.