> ----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Taylor [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:18 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Big companies using Subversion ?
> I think this is a symptom of a problem for a number of open source
> projects and something where, as much as I hate to say it, commercial
> closed-source does a better job. I've noticed that quite a few (but
> deff not even most) open source projects are reluctant to react to
> user feedback. A lot of times there is an attitude of 'well that's
> just not what i want my software to do' approach by the lead
> developers. I think it then starts to become an ego issue. If enough
> of the userbase wants a feature, it should probably be included ...
> especially if it can be accomplished in such a manner that it doesn't
> impact users who don't want the new feature.
Maybe, maybe not. Subversion was designed to be used in a
world-wide environment instead of on a closed corporate LAN. Which is
* it doesn't have heavy permissions, since open source is meant
to be open, plus the idea of trying to configure permissions for a world
wide audience is..... daunting, bordering on silly?
* it's also why Subversion has server side hooks instead of
client side hooks. Client side hooks allow you greater control and
information management which is very nice (and almost critical) for a
coporate LAN. However, since your Subversion client was designed to be
able to check out/in code from publicly available Subversion servers
world-wide, you do not want some random server executing hooks on your
client or gathering information about your client.
I don't think it's a case of developers ignoring the audience, I
think it's a case of corporate customers ignoring Subversion's goal of
providing open-source developers with a version control system that can
support developers world-wide. If coporate customers need/want a
Subversion that takes advantage of closed coporate LANs, then they will
probably need to pony up some developers and money to develop
Underpants Gnomes Disclaimer: I'm not bashing coporations. I'm just
saying that Open Source needs and coporate needs are not the same.
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. GA621
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Tue Sep 12 20:08:47 2006