[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Suspending commits

From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-07-24 14:58:55 CEST

On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 03:25, Michael Pickard wrote:
> Because there may be a need to rebuild if something fails UAT, hence
> ‚€˜without my prior authorisation‚€™.
>
> If I needed to rebranch each time, I‚€™d get at least one or two new
> branches a week *plus* any branches created by failed UAT ‚€“ it would
> soon become unwieldy.

Why is that a problem? You can delete them from the HEAD view
if they are distracting. I think you need a branch if you
want the option to update it independently from the trunk.
If they don't result in releases that you need to be able to
maintain, you should be able to merge the trunk to an existing
UAT branch to update for the next round. If you do a release
you'll want the branch as a place for later bug-fix maintenance
anyway.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@gmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 24 14:55:56 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.