[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: Suspending commits

From: Michael Pickard <mpickard_at_visitlondon.com>
Date: 2006-07-24 10:25:41 CEST

Because there may be a need to rebuild if something fails UAT, hence
'without my prior authorisation'.

If I needed to rebranch each time, I'd get at least one or two new
branches a week *plus* any branches created by failed UAT - it would
soon become unwieldy.



From: Mike Craig [mailto:Mike.Craig@freeclear.com]
Sent: 21 July 2006 17:24
To: Nico Kadel-Garcia; Michael Pickard; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: RE: Re: Suspending commits


Why not branch, and build from the branch?
Michael Pickard
Software Engineer
Visit London
6th Floor,
2 More London Riverside, London, SE1 2RR
Tel: +44 (0)20 7234 5857
Fax: +44 (0)20 7234 5751

Visit London is the official visitor organisation for London. Visit London is partly funded by Partnership, the Mayor's London Development Agency and the Association of London Government.
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the message. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not of Visit London. We reserve the right to read and monitor any email or attachment entering or leaving our systems without prior notice.
Received on Mon Jul 24 10:27:07 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.