[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: initial setup one huge changeset or in pieces

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-07-15 21:20:21 CEST

On 7/15/06, gmu 2k6 <gmu2006@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Ryan Schmidt <subversion-2006c@ryandesign.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 15, 2006, at 18:04, gmu 2k6 wrote:
> >
> > > is there any performance impact whether I try to import an existing
> > > tree in one step by import or add/commit or if I do it in some
> > > well-defined steps? fsfs will be the backend.
> > > btw, while trying to import a >5GiB tree with many C/Java sources and
> > > a lot of binary resources svnserve (started via xinetd) just stopped
> > > and refused any connections (according to the error message on the
> > > client side). right now I'm trying to do it by adding and committing.
> > > is there anyway to get logs from svnserve?
> >
> > I don't think there are any logs from svnserve.
> >
> > Commits of > 2 GiB are supported if you use APR 1.2.x or greater.
> > They are not possible with APR 0.9.x for example. Check what version
> > of APR you're using.
> I've used Debian 2.0.x APR while building SVN-1.3.2. What's the reason for
> bundling 0.9.x with Subversion?

There's no such thing as APR 2.0.x; there is Apache 2.0.x, which is
based on APR 0.9.x. And there you have the reason to ship APR 0.9.x:
we need to build with an Apache compatible APR version for



To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 15 21:21:37 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.