So is this a bug? Should it be submitted to another e-mail list or entered
into some system so the issue can be tracked and resolved in future release?
Johnathan
On 5/24/06 8:47 AM, "Gale, David" <David.Gale@Hypertherm.com> wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> On May 24, 2006, at 14:54, Johnathan Gifford wrote:
>>
>>>> When you do revisions by date/time, the current revision at the
>>>> start time is what was reported. So, if at 2006-05-17T00:05, the
>>>> current latest revision is what was checked in at 2006-05-16
>>>> 17:18:43 -0500, that's what will be reported as the first revision
>>>> in the log.
>>>>
>>>> It took me an hour or two while working on my log reporting script
>>>> to reconcile this in my head too.
>>>>
>>>> What's the timestamp on revision 14663? It should be later than
>>>> 2006-05-17T00:05 If it's not, then there might be a bug.
>>>
>>> The next revision in that path:
>>>
>>> r14696 | jdoe | 2006-05-17 15:30:47 -0500 (Wed, 17 May 2006) | 1 line
>>>
>>> I've been running a report script for four weeks with the above
>>> command and this is the first time this anomaly has shown up. I
>>> would agree with your statement about the latest revision if I was
>>> only looking one day, but I'm searching by a range. I would expect
>>> only revisions between that range to be returned.
>>
>> Well, that's not what Subversion does, and that's not what's
>> described in the book.
>
> Actually, it *is* what's described in the book:
>
> (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.html#svn.tour.revs
> .dates)
> "You can also use a range of dates. Subversion will find all revisions
> between both dates, inclusive:"
>
> I played around with this a bit, and I couldn't convince myself that
> subversion was handling things correctly (or, at least, consistently):
>
> $ svn log -q -r{2005-11-22T00:05}:{2005-11-30T00:05} <file>.pl
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r17 | dgale | 2005-11-11 09:48:08 -0500 (Fri, 11 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r18 | dgale | 2005-11-23 10:04:04 -0500 (Wed, 23 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r25 | dgale | 2005-11-29 08:12:01 -0500 (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r27 | dgale | 2005-11-29 17:18:53 -0500 (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> # The r17, which is clearly earlier than the requested range, mirrors
> what Johnathan is seeing.
>
> $ svn log -q -r{2005-11-23T00:05}:{2005-11-30T00:05} <file>.pl
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r25 | dgale | 2005-11-29 08:12:01 -0500 (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r27 | dgale | 2005-11-29 17:18:53 -0500 (Tue, 29 Nov 2005)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> # r18 doesn't show up, despite that being the last version of the file
> before the requested range.
>
> Either I'm misunderstanding something, or one of these two commands
> isn't working as expected. (I'd argue that the first command isn't
> working, since "svn log -r20:30 <file>.pl" only reports revisions 25 and
> 28--revision 18 is out of range.)
>
> -David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 30 20:06:26 2006