[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: subversion 1.3.1 configure issue

From: Jerry Zhao <zhaoj_at_vumclib.mc.vanderbilt.edu>
Date: 2006-05-17 16:24:38 CEST

Thanks. I had some trouble searching the svn bug database ;)

I found out that even though apache 2.0.58 does not link to bdb by
default, one can enable it with the "--with-berkeley-db" option.

I need to build with bdb for backward compatibility.

Regards,

Jerry.

On Wed, 17 May 2006, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> On May 16, 2006, at 23:39, Jerry Zhao wrote:
>
>> I am having problems running configure for subversion 1.3.1 with
>> httpd-2.0.58 installed:
>>
>> ./configure --prefix=/home/svn-1.3.1 --with-ssl --with-apr=/home/httpd2
>> --with-apr-util=/home/httpd2 --with-apxs=/home/httpd2/sbin/apxs
>> --disable-nls
>>
>> ...
>> configure: Apache Portable Runtime (APR) library configuration
>> checking for APR... yes
>> checking APR version... 0.9.12
>> wanted regex is 0\.9\.[5-9] or 1\.
>> configure: error: invalid apr version found
>
> Oop! Looks like someone never expected there to be a version of APR 0.9
> greater than 0.9.9. Looks like this bug was already fixed in Subversion trunk
> on March 26, 2006, in r19039:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=19039
>
> and improved/corrected in trunk r19057:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=19057
>
> and merged to the 1.3.x branch on April 2 in r19125:
>
> http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn?view=rev&revision=19125
>
> So it'll be in Subversion 1.3.2.
>
>
>> So I modified the configure script to recognize the new apr version, but
>> since httpd 2.0.58 no longer linked to bdb, configure still failed:
>>
>> ...
>> configure: WARNING: we have configured without BDB filesystem support
>>
>>
>> You don't seem to have Berkeley DB version 4.0.14 or newer
>> installed and linked to APR-UTIL. We have created Makefiles which
>> will build without the Berkeley DB back-end; your repositories will
>> use FSFS as the default back-end. You can find the latest version of
>> Berkeley DB here:
>>
>> Are these bugs or am I missing something? Any feedback is appreciated!
>
> Is there a particular reason why you want BerkeleyDB? I recommend building
> Subversion without it. There's a configure switch for that. Or it sounds like
> the above is just a warning (not an error) which you can just ignore.
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 17 16:27:24 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.