That's for the clarification Garrett...
I've managed to source the appropriate APR source, however, from a quick
check of the Apache mailing list archives, I'm not expecting to have
much luck with building an Apache2.2 friendly subversion binary, without
a far greater investment of time that I can currently afford.
What kind of timeline is an Apache2.2 friendly binary for windows likely
to be? Are we talking a month or two, or are there considerable issues
with moving across to the 1.x versions of the APR?
Cheers,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: rooneg@gmail.com [mailto:rooneg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Garrett
Rooney
Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 4:18 AM
To: Durack, Paul (CMAR, Hobart)
Cc: josander@tigris.org; users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: mod_dav_svn/mod_authz_svn - SVN1.3.1 + Apache2.2.2
On 5/9/06, Paul.Durack@csiro.au <Paul.Durack@csiro.au> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Garrett,
>
> I've just chased down the latest sources for the Apache APR, these
> include:
> APR 1.2.7, APR-util 1.2.7 and APR iconv 1.1.1 - if I replace the 0.9.7
> versions included in the Subversion 1.3.1 windows source archive will
I
> be happily compiling a workable Subversion 1.3.1 or will the whole
thing
> fall over in a horrible heap...
>
> Just wondering if I should save myself the trouble? I'm a very new
> starter to compiling my own binary stuff...
You should use whatever APR versions come with your Apache install,
you should NOT go out and download different versions, that's just
asking for trouble. There should be instructions on how to build on
windows in the INSTALL file, that should give you some idea how to
proceed.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 12 06:11:58 2006