[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: subversion 1.3.1 + apr 0.9.7 = memory leak?

From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>
Date: 2006-05-05 05:14:59 CEST

David Young <dyoung@pobox.com> writes:

> I am now reading the code, and I cannot find any indication that it isn't
> (supposed) to work just as you say. Is Subversion known to leak entries
> by design? Where does this caching occur?

Take a look at svn_wc_entries_read.

Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 5 05:16:55 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.