Re: Windows hook extensions: documentation inconsistent with code

On 3/26/06, Darko Miletic <darko@uvcms.com> wrote:
> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > On Mar 26, 2006, at 17:03, Darko Miletic wrote:
> >
> > So it sounds Subversion should be rewritten to use PATHEXT, and the
> > book should be rewritten to reflect that this is the case?
> >
>
> It could be done this way. It is important to note that it only works on
> windows NT/2k/Xp/2003, older versions of windows work in different manner.

How far back should Subversion support Windows in the first place? NT
isn't even supported by Microsoft anymore. Win9x has been cut off for
quite a while, and ME probably has been as well.

Why not check for PATHEXT, if it exists use it, if it doesn't then
fall back to the current processing?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 26 23:49:23 2006