[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Windows hook extensions: documentation inconsistent with code

From: Darko Miletic <darko_at_uvcms.com>
Date: 2006-03-26 21:17:39 CEST

Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2006, at 17:03, Darko Miletic wrote:
> So it sounds Subversion should be rewritten to use PATHEXT, and the
> book should be rewritten to reflect that this is the case?

It could be done this way. It is important to note that it only works on
windows NT/2k/Xp/2003, older versions of windows work in different manner.

> Are there any situations in which PATHEXT could be empty or
> inappropriate, such that Subversion would still need a fall-back to a
> hard-coded extension list like it does now?

It is possible to check the content of PATHEXT. If it is empty than
fallback to internal extension list.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 26 21:18:38 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.