RE: Subversion vs. CVSNT demo

> I see that both do much of what we're
> looking for, such as atomic commits, binary
> deltas, and user authentication against our
> Windows Domain server.

As far as I know CVS (and therefor WinCVS) doesn't have atomic commits,
which makes it totally useless from my point of view :-)

Here's a link to a nice comparison of the various version control
systems out there:

http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html

Greetings,

Leon Zandman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 22 08:34:15 2006