Re: I, too, miss tags.

On Friday 24 February 2006 22:35, John Beppu wrote:

> For what it's worth, I like svn's way of tagging much better than cvs's
> way.  Using copying to tag and branch feels more Unix'ish (which is a
> good thing in my opinion).

The matter seems to boil down to personal preferences.

I use exclusively Linux, I never used CVS seriously, but still I find tags/
directory akward and counterintuitive. In more that a year with Subversion I
could not get used to it, so probaly I never will.

OTOH, labels would not preclude using tags/ directory those who want/like it.
It would just add another (cheap) feature to a subversion client that might
have good uses.

Sure, I do not urge Subversion team to rush implementing labels, especially
since they seem to dislike the concept. But for thos who want labels, they
can easily implemented in a wrapper (say perl) script around 'svn' command.
So thats the way to go at the moment, I believe.

-- 
Saulius Gražulis
Visuomeninė organizacija "Atviras Kodas Lietuvai"
P.Vileišio g. 18
LT-10306 Vilnius
Lietuva (Lithuania)
tel/fax:      (+370-5)-210 40 05
mobilus:      (+370-684)-49802, (+370-614)-36366
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org