Re: Simple Question, go back revision
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+svn_at_vinc17.org>
Date: 2006-02-24 13:41:58 CET
On 2006-02-23 22:06:17 -0500, Andy Levy wrote:
Yes, this is what I meant. In such a way one won't see rev 16 in the
> IMHO, better to use the reverse merge than a delete/copy.
Why better?
-- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent_at_vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Feb 24 13:43:27 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.