Re: CVS v. SVN
From: Saulius Grazulis <grazulis_at_akl.lt>
Date: 2006-02-24 07:36:31 CET
On Thursday 23 February 2006 17:33, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> I understood the differences between CVS (a locking reporsitory) and SVN (a
Well, I would put it this way:
SVN (and CVS) merge in your working copy, *not* in the repository. You will
In this way, SVN repository is always kept free of conflicts (a good
The repository server does not care about merging changes, it only accepts new
> Then tells me that
Not quite true, I would say.
Locking appeared, I guess, only in subversion >= 1.2.0 and is in general
There are, however, situations were locks are very useful (e.g. when editing
I am not much familiar with CVS, but I guess CVS can also merge changes in
Regards,
-- Dr. Saulius Gražulis Visuomeninė organizacija "Atviras Kodas Lietuvai" P.Vileišio g. 18 LT-10306 Vilnius Lietuva (Lithuania) tel/fax: (+370-5)-210 40 05 mobilus: (+370-684)-49802, (+370-614)-36366 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Feb 24 07:57:45 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.