Mark Galbreath wrote:
> Already did this. When I signed up for the users mail list, the
> subscribe verification had "svn@" as the originator, so I assumed that
> was the users list address. I have been enlightened (with pretty much
> the same advice) by many committers today. :-)
> Sorry for the interrruption and the sarcasm - I am still frustrated
> and am ready to delete everything and do a Red Hat up2date
> auto-install of an earlier version. Apparently it is either that or
> down-versioning Apache httpd to a 2.0 series that I know works with
> svn 1.2.3.
> All day today, however, I have not seen a single post from anybody who
> has tested svn 1.3.0 with httpd 2.2.0.
> >>> <email@example.com> 16-Feb-06 11:23:44 AM >>>
> Can you please resend to firstname.lastname@example.org, not svn@? The
> latter is for automated commit mails, not humans.
> I suggest changing the tone of your last paragraph. Insulting the
> committers, even by implication, isn't going to get you very far :-).
> Their reaction is likely to be "Yes, sorry the documentation is not
> yet caught up, and thank you for volunteering to fix it. How can we
> help you get to work?"
> www.collab.net <http://www.collab.net%A0> <> CollabNet |
> Distributed Development On Demand
> "Mark Galbreath" <GalbreathM@gao.gov> writes:
> > 'bdb''
> > or
> > 'fsfs'
> > Could not fetch resource information. [500, #0]
> > Could not open the requested SVN filesystem [500, #160033]
> > Yes, I've read every friggin post in the mail archive, everything on
> the svn website, and even RTFM (book).
> > That being said, I am using Apache 2.2.0 with svn 1.3.0. All the
> DAV/SVN/AUTHZ modules are loaded, and my httpd.conf entry looks like this:
> > <Location /svn>
> > DAV svn
> > SVNParentPath /opt/svn # one repos under parent right now
> called 'newwww'
> > # plus all the usual security crap that is commented out right now
> > </Location>
> > Yes, the owner/group of the repos is identical to Apache httpd.
> > So wtf is this fail-to-load error (which screws everything) showing
> up in the apache error_log every time I try to use the svn client or a
> web browser to connect to the repos? I've been trying to solve this
> for 2 days!!!
> > And for that matter, wtf am I reading documentation that still
> refers to 1.1 and 1.2??? If you committers are going to release the
> software, don't you think updating the DOCUMENTATION would be a Good
> Thing, too?
> > Mark<-|->kraM
At this point your attitude and tone are about to get you ignored on
If you had read my earlier post
stated that I HAVE compiled Subversion 1.3 against Apache 2.2.
I will not retype that out for you. You can read it and respond to it.
Preferably in a sensible manner that does not attempt to belittle
anyone's efforts to try to help you without charging you as much as a
penny. If Subversion is to difficult for you then perhaps it is not
right for you and you can find another product that suits your needs and
your patience a little better.
Received on Thu Feb 16 19:53:37 2006