RE: svn+ssh performance with tortoise
From: Jonathan Chum <xanthis_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-12-03 16:59:15 CET
We've noticed that as the tree structure increases, trying to commit changes
So instead, I just commit the folders as needed, and not doing it at the
- Jonathan
-- http://www.primotrac.com Project Management, Anytime, Anywhere -----Original Message----- From: Tony Butt [mailto:tony.butt@cea.com.au] Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 5:07 PM To: users@subversion.tigris.org Cc: Nick Thompson Subject: Re: svn+ssh performance with tortoise Nick Thompson wrote: > Being on RHEL3 with its very bad apache installation and already > having ssh setup nicely, I plumped for svn+ssh as an access protocol > - along with ssh-agent of course. It works very well from svn command > line and just as well from kdesvn GUI and kioslaves. Very fast > indeed. > > Of course it wasn't long before some users asked for access from > windows. So I got a laptop, installed tortoise and putty and I'm in. > Excellent. But its very slow. It seems to spend an age "thinking > about it" before any operation proceeds. Putty itself connects a > little slower than ssh on linux, but I'm note sure thats enough to > explain it. > > Is this other peoples experiance as well? Can I tune anything to > improve the situation? > > Thanks, > Our experience is that subversion runs faster from a linux client than a windows client (tortoise ro command line svn). The windows clients do seem to have a stall time before they get going, which we cannot account for. Tony Butt CEA TEchnologies --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Dec 3 17:01:43 2005 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.