[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Re: SVN without server?

From: Gale, David <David.Gale_at_Hypertherm.com>
Date: 2005-10-19 22:02:57 CEST

Scott Palmer wrote:
> On 19-Oct-05, at 11:50 AM, Reite Karl J wrote:
>> Thank you for your reply.
>> I then think I will try to use ssh and tunelling.
> Why? If you are on the same LAN and the users already have read/write
> access to the repository directory, then you don't even need a server
> at all if you don't want one. Though I think it is probably better
> in the long run to use a server. svnserve would work fine. What
> purpose would the SSH tunnel serve?

Well, if everyone's got a login account on the server, using svn+ssh
allows him to avoid creating new accounts. And using a server is much
better than using file:///, if for no other reason than the ability to
track who made which changes.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 19 22:08:29 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.