[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Relative performance of http:// vs. svn://

From: Carsten Koch <Carsten.Koch_at_icem.com>
Date: 2005-09-15 17:44:28 CEST

Daniel Morbach Serodio wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Does anyone have any numbers wrt the relative performance of the http and the
> svn protocols?

I do not have exact numbers, but I know that http can be
e - x - t - r - e - m - e - l - y s - l - o - w
sometimes. See the thread
"svn list -R of medium-size repository takes 10 hours."
in this list.
Just today I got a call from one of my users who complained
how very slow "svn co" is compared to "gunzip < f | tar xf -".
So, if performance is very important to you, you may be
better off with the svn protocol.

Carsten.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 15 17:47:36 2005

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Users mailing list.